Jump to content

Which game is more fun?


OPReN
 Share

Recommended Posts

They are both different types of fun. The first being more oriented towards the draft phase, and the execution of different comp strats. (and a lot of the time oriented towards one meta which can sometimes get stale quickly) second also has a lot to do with meta depending on how different the heroes are. Also less variation in comp execution but more focus on individual player and heroes strengths and weaknesses and abusing those, teamwork still a big part tho. -IMO at least.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Balanced is more fun than broken heroes. Broken heroes are auto banned so having them just means a decreased hero pool. If they aren't autobanned then they ruin the game either by being a forced pick or ban every single game or by dominating the game, making playing against it pointless.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well there ARE games where "everyone one shot everyone", and are relatively popular.

When everyone builds glass cannon.

 

Besides, I never said anything about fun. Just that everything broken = balanced. Balance (in generic terms) has to do with equality, not enjoyment.

The thread is about enjoyment.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here is nothing but facts:

 

SC1 - everything overpowered = alive game

SC2 - everything is balanced = dead game.

EggSackedLee

 

On serious note, what's the point of making game balanced after it's dead?

Edited by OPReN
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...